Церковные ВѢХИ

Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus. Outside the Church there is no salvation, because salvation is the Church. For salvation is the revelation of the way for everyone who believes in Christ's name. This revelation is to be found only in the Church. In the Church, as in the Body of Christ, in its theanthropic organism, the mystery of incarnation, the mystery of the "two natures," indissolubly united, is continually accomplished. -Fr. Georges Florovsky

ΟΡΘΟΔΟΞΙΑ Ή ΘΑΝΑΤΟΣ!

ΟΡΘΟΔΟΞΙΑ Ή ΘΑΝΑΤΟΣ!
§ 20. For our faith, brethren, is not of men nor by man, but by revelation of Jesus Christ, which the divine Apostles preached, the holy Ecumenical Councils confirmed, the greatest and wisest teachers of the world handed down in succession, and the shed blood of the holy martyrs ratified. Let us hold fast to the confession which we have received unadulterated from such men, turning away from every novelty as a suggestion of the devil. He that accepts a novelty reproaches with deficiency the preached Orthodox Faith. But that Faith has long ago been sealed in completeness, not to admit of diminution or increase, or any change whatever; and he who dares to do, or advise, or think of such a thing has already denied the faith of Christ, has already of his own accord been struck with an eternal anathema, for blaspheming the Holy Ghost as not having spoken fully in the Scriptures and through the Ecumenical Councils. This fearful anathema, brethren and sons beloved in Christ, we do not pronounce today, but our Savior first pronounced it (Matt. xii. 32): Whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come. St. Paul pronounced the same anathema (Gal. i. 6): I marvel that ye are so soon removed from Him that called you into the grace of Christ, unto another Gospel: which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the Gospel of Christ. But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you, than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. This same anathema the Seven Ecumenical Councils and the whole choir of God-serving fathers pronounced. All, therefore, innovating, either by heresy or schism, have voluntarily clothed themselves, according to the Psalm (cix. 18), ("with a curse as with a garment,") whether they be Popes, or Patriarchs, or Clergy, or Laity; nay, if any one, though an angel from heaven, preach any other Gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Thus our wise fathers, obedient to the soul-saving words of St. Paul, were established firm and steadfast in the faith handed down unbrokenly to them, and preserved it unchanged and uncontaminate in the midst of so many heresies, and have delivered it to us pure and undefiled, as it came pure from the mouth of the first servants of the Word. Let us, too, thus wise, transmit it, pure as we have received it, to coming generations, altering nothing, that they may be, as we are, full of confidence, and with nothing to be ashamed of when speaking of the faith of their forefathers. - Encyclical of the Holy Eastern Patriarchs of 1848

За ВѢру Царя И Отечество

За ВѢру Царя И Отечество
«Кто еси мимо грядый о нас невѣдущиiй, Елицы здѣ естесмо положены сущи, Понеже нам страсть и смерть повѣлѣ молчати, Сей камень возопiетъ о насъ ти вѣщати, И за правду и вѣрность къ Монарсѣ нашу Страданiя и смерти испiймо чашу, Злуданьем Мазепы, всевѣчно правы, Посѣченны зоставше топоромъ во главы; Почиваемъ въ семъ мѣстѣ Матери Владычнѣ, Подающiя всѣмъ своимъ рабомъ животь вѣчный. Року 1708, мѣсяца iюля 15 дня, посѣчены средь Обозу войсковаго, за Бѣлою Церковiю на Борщаговцѣ и Ковшевомъ, благородный Василiй Кочубей, судiя генеральный; Iоаннъ Искра, полковникъ полтавскiй. Привезены же тѣла ихъ iюля 17 въ Кiевъ и того жъ дня въ обители святой Печерской на семъ мѣстѣ погребены».
Loading...

Monday, March 1, 2010

"Holodomor," Soviet famine of 1932–1933

Soviet famine of 1932–1933
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Soviet famine of 1932–1933 affected major grain-producing areas of the Soviet Union which included Ukraine, Northern Caucasus, Volga Region and Kazakhstan[1], South Urals, West Siberia[2][3]. The manifestation of this famine in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic is referred to as Holodomor. Unlike a famine in the Russian SFSR in 1921, information about the famine of 1932–34 was suppressed by the Soviet authorities until perestroika, the political and economic reforms which ended the Soviet Union in the early 1990s.

Contents [hide]
1 Estimation of the loss of life
2 See also
3 Notes
4 References

[edit] Estimation of the loss of life
Encyclopædia Britannica estimates that six to eight million people died from hunger in the Soviet Union during this period, about four to five million of whom were Ukrainians.[4]
Robert Conquest estimated at least 7 million peasants' deaths from hunger in the European part of the Soviet Union in 1932–33 (5 million in Ukraine; 1 million in the North Caucasus, and 1 million elsewhere), and an additional 1 million of deaths from hunger as a result of collectivization in Kazakhstan[5].
The Black Book of Communism estimates 6 million deaths in 1932–33.
The 2004 book The Years of Hunger: Soviet Agriculture, 1931–33 by R.W. Davies and S.G. Wheatcroft, gives an estimate of 5.5–6.5 million deaths.[6]
Another study[7] using data given by Davies and Wheatcroft estimates "‘about eight and a half million’ victims of famine and repression" combined in the period 1930–33.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_famine_of_1932–1933



On Oct. 1, Joseph Stalin's five-year plan to industrialize the Soviet Union and establish collective farming goes into effect. Millions who resist are killed; famine kills millions more. The total death toll between 1928-1932 is as high as 25 million.

Public ranked this story 93

http://www.newseum.org/century/j_timeline/75_1928_soviet_modernization/index.htm



The Soviet Famine of 1931-33: Politically Motivated or Ecological Disaster?
Stephen Wheatcroft, Professor of History, University of Melbourne, Australia, presented new information on the famine based on extensive archival data now available on the tragedy of the Soviet countryside, in a talk sponsored by the Center for European & Eurasian Studies on May 5, 2003.

By Carla Thorson


Was the great Soviet famine of 1931-1933 purposely designed by the Soviet leadership to quell Ukrainian nationalism or was it an accident of ecological dimensions? Professor Stephen Wheatcroft, University of Melbourne Australia argued that neither is entirely correct, based on extensive archival research from the period.

In a talk sponsored by the Center for European & Eurasian Studies at UCLA on May 5th, Wheatcroft also challenged previous estimates of the number of people who died during the famine. His conclusions are based on statistical analysis of demographic and economic data, gathered while working among a large group of Western, Russian, and Asian scholars analyzing a vast collection of formerly secret Soviet documents, to be published in 6 volumes, entitled Tragediia Sovetskoi Derevni (The Tragedy of the Soviet Countryside). These volumes contain extensive evidence that this was a Soviet-wide famine, and the data presented here permit a more accurate assessment of the human tragedy.

In 1987, Robert Conquest (Stanford University) published "Harvest of Sorrow" the first full history of collectivization, dekulakization and the famine, in which he argued that these events were largely manmade and politically motivated. He estimated the deaths during this period from these policies combined at 14.5 million (7 million of these from the famine itself). Mark B. Tauger (University of West Virginia) along with other scholars has since challenged Conquest's account. Two articles by Tauger , "The 1932 Harvest and the Soviet Famine of 1932-1933," Slavic Review, Spring 1991, and "Natural Disaster and Human Actions in the Soviet Famine of 1931-1933, Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies, June 2001, present evidence that the famine resulted directly from a poor harvest, a harvest that was much smaller than officially acknowledged. He argues that this small harvest was in turn the result of a complex of natural disasters that [with one small exception] no previous scholars have ever discussed or even mentioned.

Wheatcroft suggested that the answer lies somewhere in between. Soviet state procurement policies clearly contributed to the famine, but it was not a grand design on the part of the Bolsheviks, nor was it entirely directed at Ukrainians. He argued that the famine was an accidental consequence of ill-conceived policies, and that Ukraine suffered inordinantly for demographic reasons. At the same time, he did not go so far as to say that the Tauger assessment is entirely accurate. He agreed that ecological factors were clearly significant, but he suggested that comparative study of the causes of modern famine worldwide indicate that most are caused by problems with exchange entitlements (a disequilibrium in the market) and not because of declining food availability. The Soviet famine, in his view, is no exception. Throughout the 1920s, the Soviet government had relied increasingly on state requisitioning of grain from the countryside to feed the urban population, and this policy over the years left the peasantry with no reserves. As early as, 1927 a grain procurement crisis had already developed, but it was the natural factors of insufficient rainfall in Spring of 1930, 1931, and 1932 and too much rain during midsummer in these years that contributed to the smaller harvest, based on weather data now available. There is also archival evidence of natural phenomena like wheat rust and ergotism that infected the grain supplies.

Finally, on the basis of substantial analysis of Soviet registration documents and mortality statistics, Wheatcroft concluded that the estimates of the human losses have been grossly exaggerated. In his view, the number of deaths due to the famine should be more accurately reported at around 4.5 million. A number, he was careful to point, that represents a horrendous human tragedy. But a tragedy at 4.5 million people is not any greater tragedy if the number is inflated to 7 million or more.



Center for European and Eurasian Studies

http://www.international.ucla.edu/article.asp?parentid=3838




The Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933 as an Act of Genocide

Christina Maslo (The author contradicts herself here by specifying the Soviet government encouraged "Ukrainian nationalism" in the 1920s, that its understanding of itself as a "separate national phenomenon" is late by one of its leaders, that the famine was not limited to the Ukraine. Thus she argues that the Soviets created the "Ukrainian nationality" to stage a famine which affected a greater part of Russia than the "Ukraine" to "uproot a Ukrainian" nationalism which had to be inculcated and encouraged by the Bolsheviks and wasn't one of their provocations for collectivization: making agriculture more efficient to fund Soviet industrialization was, nor did the "Ukrainian nationalists" and "language" pass out of existence with Stalin. Thus the famines were not about the Ukraine, but about SOVIET collectivization and were All-Russian Phenomena, aimed at achieving SOCIALIST ends, purging counter revolution (not "Ukrainian" aid to that Revolution), which "Ukrainian nationalists theretofore had supported" in exchange for Soviet patronage. That is what this author's facts state in contradiction of herself and to the denigration of millions of victims who were neither "Ukrainian" nor in any way associated with a "ukrainophobe" policy yet perished in these famines which lasted from 1928-1933. Base nationalist propaganda which clearly contradicts itself and uses this as a nationalist wedge between Russian peoples when those very same "Ukrainian nationalists" owe their existence and presence in the Ukraine to the very russophobic Soviet government whose methodologies they openly supported.-R)



The 1932-33 Ukrainian (SIC!) Famine is certainly one of the greatest tragedies of the twentieth century, and perhaps one of the least understood, in which as many as ten million people starved on the fertile lands of the Soviet Ukraine. In analyzing the famine in Ukraine 1932-33 or Holodomor as it is known in Ukrainian, it cannot be considered as an isolated incident against the Ukrainian people. Examination of the Ukrainian Famine of 1932-33 encompasses both political and economic actions of this time. Although not expounded in this essay, there were influential events preceding and succeeding 1932-33. It can be viewed as the most tragic event in a long history of Ukrainians struggling under Russian rule. From the early times of the Tsarist Empire, Ukrainians have been struggling to preserve their identity and autonomy in the face of Russification and the suppression of political and cultural freedoms. Ukrainians endured restrictions on Ukrainian language and literature, as well as the persecution of Ukrainian intellectuals. Ukrainians were the second largest nationality group in the Russian sphere of control, second only to Russians, and were considered to be the thorniest nationality problem. 1 However, through the centuries, Ukrainians have repeatedly rebelled against Russian authority. 2

During the Russian Revolution, Ukrainian nationalism was emerging and the first independent Ukrainian state, later crushed by the Bolsheviks, was created on January 22, 1918. In response to growing Ukrainian national feeling, Lenin took measures to appease the peasantry with a policy of indigenization in 1923-24, known in Ukraine as Ukrainization, which allowed for some cultural concessions. However, in 1924 when Josef Stalin became the new Soviet ruler and began to consolidate his power, the Ukrainian national aspirations became more problematic for Moscow. Stalin, whose main priority was the rapid industrialization of the Soviet Union, required changes in both the industrial and agricultural sectors of the economy. Agriculturally, Stalin’s plan was to collectivize agriculture, which in 1928 forced the peasant farmers to move from cultivating their tiny private plots to farming large state collective farms (kolkhoz in Russian, kolhosp in Ukrainian), where the government relied on communal labour to meet the grain quotas set by the state. The government could then control what was being sown, how much was collected and how the harvest would be utilized. However, collectivization was met with fierce opposition from the peasantry, especially in Ukraine. At the same time, Ukrainian nationalism continued to flourish and there persisted the uncertainty as to whether or not Ukraine would break away from the Communist Russian state, as it had in 1918, and Moscow would lose “the bread basket of Europe.” Stalin relied on the highly fertile lands and hard labour of Ukraine to extract grain needed for export, in order to raise capital required to purchase industrial machinery. The refusal of the Ukrainian peasantry, who were always associated with Ukrainian nationalism 3, to join the collectives was seen by Moscow as a “nationalist rebellion” 4; and the growing Ukrainian patriotic feeling was considered threatening. Historian and famine survivor, Miron Dolot states that

Moscow could not tolerate such dissent, and, not unexpectantly, struck Ukraine with all its might. It used the policy of collectivization and the state grain collection campaign as vehicles of war against the Ukrainian national movement, and the Famine was to be the weapon with which Moscow dealt its final blow. 5

In regards to these policies against the Ukrainian nationalist movement, Dolot believes the Kremlin committed genocide against the Ukrainian people. James Mace, a leading famine researcher from Harvard University, strongly advocates the genocide case, and asserts that the famine was a “final solution on the most pressing nationality problem in the Soviet Union… which constitutes an act of genocide.” 6 On the other hand, some historians do not conclude the famine was an act of genocide and question its national character. Professor of History at the West Virginia University, Mike Tauger and Professor of History at the University of Melbourne, Steven Wheatcroft, argue that the famine was not a result of a deliberate policy against the Ukrainians, by contending that starvation was due to misguided economic policies, to drought conditions, and to a much smaller harvest than originally believed. 7 Others, such as Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn are uncomfortable about using the word genocide to describe the famine since the intent of Stalin to destroy the Ukrainian nation is not apparent to them. They prefer to use the term mass extermination or one-sided mass killing. 8 Still others, such as Canadian trade union activist, Douglas Tottle, argue along traditional Communist lines, that reports of the famine and its impact on Ukraine have been exaggerated and are simply part of western propaganda campaigns directed against the Soviet Union. 9 However, with investigation, it is clear that the famine was artificial and politically motivated to break the Ukrainian people as a national force. The most convincing interpretation is that the culminating actions of the 1932-33 Ukrainian Famine- those actions against the peasantry, who were the army of Ukrainian nationalism and those actions against the political authorities and intelligentsia, who were the leaders of the nationalist movement- fulfill the United Nations criteria for genocide, in which Ukrainians are regarded as a national group. (See Appendix A).

The famine was predominantly an attack on the Ukrainian peasantry through economic means. The economic measures instituted by the Soviet government neatly fulfill the UN genocide definition. The Kremlin created living conditions impossible for life and new births in Ukraine, and these led to mass death by starvation of millions of Ukrainians. The process began with the government demand for a drastically larger amount of cereal from the republics, especially the fertile Ukrainian SSR. In 1930 Stalin raised the grain target in Ukraine by 115%, exacting 7.7 million tonnes of the 23.1 million total harvest. 10 In 1931 the 7.7 million quota remained the same, even though the total harvest fell to 18.3 million, of which 30-40% was lost in harvesting. Ukraine was only able to extract 7 million. Speaking in Edmonton at a recent seminar on the famine, historian Iurii Shapoval of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Kyiv, observed that after the grain quota in Ukraine and the Kuban were raised, the peasants had less food left for themselves and 150,000 people perished. 11 This showed Stalin that it was possible to use food as a method of breaking the peasantry and teaching obedience to the state. By the spring of 1932 famine had already begun, and the harvest that year fell to 14.6 million tonnes with 40-50% of this lost during harvest. 4.7 million was procured. 12 The 1933 harvest would be even worse. When Stalin announced in July that the same 7.7 million tonne quota would again be imposed, it became “…obvious to the Ukrainian leaders that the proposed levels of requisition were not merely excessive, but quite impossible.” 13 There was much opposition from the Ukrainian Communist Party, who feared an impending catastrophe. 14 Although the quota was reduced to 6.6 million tonnes, this was “still far beyond the feasible” 15 and on October 22, 1932, a special commission headed by V. Molotov, Chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars, was created to implement the procurement policy in Ukraine and to ensure enforcement “with the utmost rigour.” 16 As Stalin expert Robert Conquest writes, “on Stalin’s insistence, a decree went out, which, if enforced, could only lead to starvation of the Ukrainian peasantry.” 17 The conditions that Stalin was beginning to inflict satisfy the UN genocide definition.

There followed decrees and policies to extract the grain and punish those not obedient, thereby exacerbating conditions unfavourable to life in Ukraine. Iurii Shapoval notes that of the three special commissions created to oversee grain procurements (the first headed by Molotov in Ukraine, the second overseen by Kaganovich in the North Caucasus, referred to as the Kuban and the third, headed by Postyshev in the Lower Volga), the commissions in Ukraine and the Ukrainian populated Kuban region (Kuban Cossacks reject "Ukrainian nationality" and were attacked for being counter-revolutionary COSSACKS, who had had Tsarist favor, not because they in any way were "Ukrainians."-R), exhibited more cruel treatment than the commission in the Russian Lower Volga. 18 According to Shavopal, “The systematic organization of the execution of Ukrainian peasants gives the Holodomor a genocidal character.” 19 The Five Stalks Law of August 7, 1932, stands out in this regard. This savage law designed to protect Socialist Property by imposing the harsh punishment of death, ten years exile or confiscation of belongings for those caught pilfering leftover wheat from the collective farms, “even an ear of grain from the harvest,” 20 was most rigorously applied in Ukraine. Watchtowers were positioned in the fields with soldiers armed with shotguns, ready to enforce this decree against any violators of Socialist Property. 21 Furthermore, in November 1932, it was forbidden for the kolhospy to have any reserves of grain and to allocate it to any collective farmers before the collective met the quota. 22 On November 20, 1932 a resolution was passed by the Ukrainian Soviet government that emphasized the following points:

1.Payment of grain to the collective farmers was halted until the quota was met.

2.Grain could be confiscated from the farmers, and including in grain deliveries, any farm supplies, which included seed. 23

To enforce this new resolution or “robbery”, 24 112,000 Communist members, the majority non-Ukrainian, from different cities around the Soviet Union, were sent to rural Ukraine. 25 On December 6, 1932, a “Black List Decree” further targeted Ukrainian peasants deemed to be counter-revolutionary. (See Appendix B) This decree, creating a “hunger blockade” 26 affecting 86 regions of Ukraine, shows how bread was used as an instrument of starvation against the Ukrainian people. “This meant that the peasant population deprived of locally produced food supplies, had no chance whatsoever of obtaining such [basic] supplies as fish, sugar, salt, etc…” 27 If the above mentioned decrees were not enough to prevent the Ukrainian peasantry from obtaining food to feed themselves, other brutal measures were taken to assert Stalinist control of the Ukrainian countryside. For example, in the Communists’ exhaustive search for the practically non-existent hidden grain taken by so-called “saboteurs”, special brigades of lower rank and file activists, called Buksyr brigades (whom Conquest, describes as simply thugs 28), were created to probe the individual homes of the starving peasants in Ukraine, taking from them every last morsel of food. The brigades used iron crow-bars to probe the houses and barns in their entirety; floorboards, attics, gardens and straw piles, for example, where trampled and searched. 29 In 1931 small amounts of hidden grain were uncovered, but in 1932, there was nothing left to take. 30 Conquest’s description can be applied throughout Ukraine. While these brigades were being sent out to impoverished peasant homes, Party and state officials in the village had plenty to eat and did not suffer from the famine. 31 Moreover, the grain that was not exported or sent to the cities or the army, was held in “State reserves”. As Conquest explains, “These were for emergencies such as war: the famine itself was not a sufficient occasion for their release.” 32 Although food was close at hand, the starving were denied. The surplus grain even rotted, unused as state property, guarded away from the people. 33 As Wasyl Hryshko puts it, “That everything was being done to kill the peasants with famine is indicated by the Draconian laws that were issued then by the Soviet government, laws whose aim was to kill as many peasants as possible.” 34 The final policy that crushed any hope of the Ukrainian peasants escaping these conditions, was the Passportization System established on December 27, 1932 by the All-Ukrainian Central Executive Committee and the Council of Peoples’ Commissars. 35 The re-introduction of the internal passport prevented the starving peasants from leaving their villages to search for food either in the cities or beyond the Ukrainian border, to Russia or Belarus. 36 (Internal passports had never passed out of existence.-R) This effectively tied peasantry to the land, condemning them to death by starvation.

Stalin’s justification of these severe measures against the peasantry was that the collective farmers were sabotaging the grain procurements by not meeting the quotas. 37 He claimed that the peasant saboteurs were hoarding grain and hiding their surplus to sell privately in the markets and, therefore, conspired against the state. However this claim is not true, as found by the 1988 United States Commission on the Ukrainian Famine. 38 If the peasants had been hoarding the grain for themselves or making it accessible in public markets, then certainly food would have been available for the starving, preventing such mass hunger. 39 Further, “Stalin deliberately inflated harvest figures as proof that non-existent grain was being hoarded.” 40 In this way Stalin made it appear that these intensive repressive measures against the Ukrainian farmers, were justified and necessary for the good of the Socialist state. In such harsh circumstances, the peasants resorted to extreme measures in attempts to survive; cannibalism was not uncommon. 41 In a personal interview, for instance, a survivor of the Ukrainian Famine and retired University of Alberta professor, Yar Slavutych, recounted a story of cannibalism in his village. A mother in a state of sheer delusion from hunger, killed her young daughter to eat, confusing her for a goose. 42 This shows the desperate and often altered mental state of the Ukrainian people trying to survive. As one Soviet author writes, “before they died, people often lost their senses and ceased to be human beings.” 43 Michael Mischenko states that:

Clinical observations of patients suffering from prolonged starvation lead to the confirmation of the following basic symptomatic complexies: 1) Sympato-tonic, 2) neuralgic, 3) neurotic, 4) hallucinatory, 5) amentive (out of mind). 44

In this way, the UN genocide definition, actions “causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group,” 45 applies to the Ukrainian Famine. Those such as Tauger and Wheatcroft, who attribute the starvation of the Ukrainian people to ecological factors such as drought and poor harvest, have failed to take into account the sheer brutality of the enforcement policies implemented by the government that could only lead to conditions impossible to life for the peasantry. Further, the US Commission on the famine and other historians, have found the claim of drought to be false; 46 and Stalin himself asserted on January 11, 1933 that the grain procurement problems of 1932 were “by no means due to the bad state of harvest.” 47 Furthermore, such historians as Tauger, Wheatcroft, Jonassohn, Chalk and Tottle, who do not recognize Stalin’s intent during the famine, fail to acknowledge the simultaneous destruction of the educated Ukrainian class.

In addition to the genocidal qualities of the economic actions directed against the Ukrainian peasantry, Stalin’s genocidal intent can be seen through the political actions in Ukraine. A recently discovered private letter that Stalin sent to Kaganovich on September 11, 1932, indicated that he had every intent of targeting Ukraine and her people. He aimed to crush his opposition, the resistant peasantry, as well as the patriotic and deviating Ukrainian leadership, in order to secure the fertile and resource rich republic solidly under the grasp of the Soviet Union.

If we do not now correct the situation in Ukraine, we could lose Ukraine. Consider that Pilsudski (Pilsudski was murdering and oppressing Ukrainians/Rusins of Poland at the time mercilessly and Soviet propaganda played it up.-R)is not daydreaming and his agents in Ukraine and his agents in Ukraine are much stronger than Redens of Kosior imagine. Also consider that within the Ukrainian Communist Party (500,000 members, ha ha) there are not a few (yes, not a few!) rotten elements that are conscious or not conscious Petliura adherents and in the final analysis agents of Piilsudsiki. If a situation gets any worse these elements won’t hesitate to open a front within (and outside) the Party, against the Party. Worst of all, the Ukrainian leadership doesn’t see these dangers… set yourself the task of turning Ukraine in the shortest possible time into a fortress of the USSR, into the most inalienable republic. Don’t worry about money for this purpose. 48

As Shapoval noted about this letter, “This was a clear anti-Ukrainian signal and Stalin did not similarly assess any other single region of the Soviet Union at that time.” 49 This shows that Stalin was ready to use ruthless measures against Ukraine and Ukrainian Communist leadership to maintain the Kremlin’s authority and control in Ukraine. In the destruction of Ukrainians as a national group, the Ukrainian Communist Party and the cultural intelligentsia were decimated concurrently with the Ukrainian peasants. Although cultural and political repressions were carried out in other republics, Ukraine was targeted in particular. 50

The famine became a handy instrument for the solution of the national question in the USSR: “…the famine… established the fact that in the economic sphere Moscow could direct Ukrainian life as it would… and it went hand in hand with the attempt the exterminate the old Ukrainian cultural life. 51

With Ukrainization, in the 1920’s, Ukraine experienced a renaissance, or golden age, that saw the flowering of Ukrainian culture. Measures adopted in Ukraine such as instituting Ukrainian as the prominent language in business and education encouraged patriotic sentiments, most notably in the Ukrainian Communist Party. Members Mykola Skrypnyk and Mykola Khvylovy in particular, began to spread their belief that the Ukrainian people were more a distinct nation, rather than citizens of the Soviet Union and “tended to regard the Ukraine as an independent republic, tied to the USSR by the bonds of the Soviet constitution.” 52 This caused considerable concern for Moscow, that feared the “Ukrainian national elements [would] divorce themselves from Communism.” 53 In January, 1933, Stalin sent Pavel Postyshev, a “pureblooded Russian” 54 and a secretary of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party, to Ukraine with the mission to:

•eliminate all opposition to collectivization and the forcible requisition of grain and

•to crush the Communists who defended Ukrainization and the republic’s economic, political, and cultural rights. 55

Postyshev enjoyed dictatorial powers in Ukraine and was praised for his anti-Ukrainian attitudes, becoming known as “the hangman of Ukraine”. 56 In 1933, in addition to enforcing severe measures against the peasantry, Postyshev commenced a campaign of eliminating nationalist threat by purging the Ukrainian Communist Party as well as repressing cultural activists and associations throughout Ukraine. Hryhory Kostiuk observes that Postyshev “left nothing untouched; every field of cultural, scholarly or scientific endeavor in the Ukraine was affected by the purge.” 57 Ukrainian writers, linguists, musicians, painters and other members of the intelligentsia were arrested, deported or killed in what was known as the “Postyshev terror.” 58 Approximately 50,000 members of the Ukrainian Communist Party, or 23%, were eventually expelled, many arrested and liquidated. 59 Postyshev’s chief objective was to destroy the leader of the Ukrainization moment, Mykola Skrypnyk. 60 However, seeing the fate that awaited him in 1933, Skrypnyk took his own life before he could be liquidated. 61 The same decision was made by Mykola Khvylovy, who chose to commit suicide rather than complying with “Moscow’s heinous plans.” 62 These repressive measures were then followed with intense Russification, 63 the imposition of Russian culture and language. James Mace notes that “…virtually everyone who had anything to do with creating a distinctly Ukrainian cultural scene in the 1920’s – disappeared” during this terrible period. 64 In these ways, “Moscow decided to eliminate all those who could be considered as being connected with the peasantry, and who might organize them and become their leaders.” 65 About 80% of the Ukrainian intelligentsia perished, 66 satisfying the first UN criterium, “killing members of the [national] group.” 67

It is important to point out that while Ukraine was primarily affected by the 1932-33 Famine, the areas of the Kuban, the Don, the Lower Volga, Kazakhstan and West Siberia were also significantly affected. Notably the Kuban and the Don, highly fertile areas, were heavily populated by Ukrainians (SIC!!! Neither the Kuban NOR THE DON ESPECIALLY are "populated by Ukrainians," but Russian Cossacks, and they were targeted not because they had ANY sympathies to "Ukrainian nationalism," but because they were Cossacks who were a RUSSIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTION who held Tsarist favour-R) . The fact that special commissions in the Kuban region and Ukraine exhibited more cruel treatment than the commission in the Russian Lower Volga (?!), suggests that Stalin may have (?!) targeted Ukrainians not only as a national group, but also as an ethnic group. Mace indicates that collectivization was carried out particularly harshly in Kazahstan and West Siberia in the years before 1932, leading to mass mortality, but the focus of 1932-33 was Ukraine. 68 He goes on to mention the contrast between adjacent areas on the Ukraine/Russia border. The distance between the Ukrainian city of Kharkiv and the Russian city of Belgorod is a mere thirty five kilometers, and both share the same climate and land conditions, yet evidence shows that only Kharkiv experienced a high mortality rate during the famine. “The fact that one was affected and the other was not can only be attributed to a deliberate policy to concentrate the famine geographically for political ends.” 69 As noted by a commentator cited in The Harvest of Sorrow, “One had only to cross the border and outside Ukraine the conditions were right away better.” 70 Also, Moscow controlled the flow of food into Ukraine, and rejected offers of aid from the Red Cross and other countries, such as Poland (including Polish Ukraine), Romania, France, Germany, Canada and the United States. 71 This is in contrast to the situation in the 1921 (SIC?!--The control of that aid was dictated by the Soviets and rationed mercilessly in the Soviet's war with the Russian Orthodox Church and robbing the Church of its valuables!-R) famine and further suggests the famine was politically motivated to assert control in Ukraine. 72 Further, in examining the USSR census results of 1926 and 1939, the population of Ukrainians fell by 9.9%, which is highly irregular since between the years 1897 and 1926, despite the devastation caused by the World War, the civil war, the revolution and the famine of 1921, the average growth rate of Ukrainians was 1.3% per year. (Sic! For one, "Ukrainian" wasn't a NATIONAL demarcation, but REGIONAL, where many in the Ukraine saw themselves as ethnically RUSIN or RUSSIAN!!!-R) The population of Russians and Belorussians, however, increased between 1926 and 1939. 73 While there is disagreement over the number of famine victims, if one uses the most recent estimate of ten million Ukrainian lives lost, the total number would amount to one third of the Soviet Ukrainian population at that time! 74



In reviewing the evidence, it can be determined that to reassert his control in fertile Ukraine, Josef Stalin went after both the Ukrainian farmers, and the intellectual and political leaders. It is evident that the combination of brutal economic policies directed at the Ukrainian peasantry, the bulwark of nationalism, and the political measures aimed at the educated and political Ukrainian class, the leaders of the nationalist movement, confirm that the 1932-33 Ukrainian Famine was an act of genocide against the Ukrainian people as a national group in the Soviet Union. Under Stalin’s leadership, conditions impossible to life and birth were created in Ukraine and up to ten million Ukrainians were killed. The terms “mass extermination” and “one-sided mass killing” do not do justice to the Ukrainian Famine, for this event clearly fits the United Nations definition of genocide. The Russian government did not officially acknowledge that the famine took place, until near the collapse of the USSR, when President Mikhail Gorbachev finally admitted its existence in 1987. Since then, with the slow release of Soviet documents, the historical debate of the famine has changed to the question of its genocidal nature. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the Ukrainian Famine was indeed genocide, with recently opening Soviet Archives yielding new evidence, such as Stalin’s letter to Kaganovich. On the 70 th anniversary of this great famine, the international community has become increasingly aware of the Ukrainian Famine and is beginning to acknowledge it as genocide. At the United Nations, on November 10, 2003, Ukraine issued a joint declaration with twenty-six other countries, recognizing the Holodomor, which means murder by hunger. Further, the Ukrainian government has officially recognized the Ukrainian Famine as genocide, along with Canada and Australia, while the United States government is in the same process. Although the Ukrainian Famine of 1932-33 remains a complex event, it has become increasingly clear for scholars and the international community alike, that not only was this a man-made famine, but also an act of genocide.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix A

The United Nations definition of genocide, as coined by Raphael Lemkin, was passed at the 1948 UN Convention on Genocide. It is as follows:

“Art. 2. In the present convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

•killing members of the group;

•causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group

•deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

•imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

•forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

From: The Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Relations. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1990, 328.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Appendix B

1. The immediate closing of state and cooperative stores, and the removal of all goods in them from the village.

2. A complete ban on all trade (including trade in essential commodities such as bread) by collective farms, collective farmers and individual farmers.

3. The immediate halting and compulsory repayment of all credits and advances (including bread.)

4. A thoroughgoing purge of local collective farm, cooperative, and state apparatuses.

5. The purge of all “foreign elements” and “saboteurs of the grain procurement campaign from the collective farm.”

From: Mace, James E. “Famine and Nationalism in Soviet Ukraine.” Problems of Communism 33, no. 3 (May-June 1984): 45.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Endnotes

1.James E. Mace, “Famine and Nationalism in Soviet Ukraine,” Problems of Communism 33, no. 3 (May-June 1984): 37.

2.For a good source of Ukrainian history, see Orest Subtelny, Ukraine: A History, rev. ed, Toronto: University of Toronto Press in association with the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 1994.

3.Miron Dolot, Who Killed Them and Why? In remembrance of those killed in the Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Ukrainian Studies Fund, 1984), 12.

4.ibid.

5.ibid.

6.Mace, 37.

7.See Mark B. Tauger, “The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933,” Slavic Review 50 (Spring 1991):170-189, and R. W. Davies, M. B. Tauger, and S. G. Wheatcroft, “Stalin, Grain Stocks and the Famine of 1932-1933,” Slavic Review 54 (Fall 1995): 642-657, and Mark B. Tauger, “Natural Disaster and Human Actions in the Soviet Famine of 1931-1933,” The Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies, no. 1506, June 2001.

8.See Frank Chalk and Kurt Jonassohn, “Conceptualizations of Genocide and Ethnocide,” in Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933, eds. Roman Serbyn, and Bohdan Krawchenko, Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, 1986.

9.See Douglas Tottle, Fraud, Famine and Fascism: The Ukrainian Genocide Myth from Hitler to Harvard, Toronto: Progress Books, 1987.

10.These and the following figures are cited in V. Holubnychy, “Collectivization,” Encyclopedia of Ukraine, 1984 ed.

11.Iurii Shapoval, “The Ukrainian SSR’s Political Leadership and the Kremlin: Co-authors of the 1932-33 Famine,” Lecture, The Ukrainian Youth Unity Centre, Edmonton, 16 November 2003.

12.Wasyl Hryshko, The Ukrainian Holocaust of 1933 (Toronto: Bahriany Foundation; Suzhero; Dobrus, 1983), 84.

13.Robert Conquest, The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine (Edmonton: University of Alberta-Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 1987), 222.

14.Hryshko, 81.

15.Conquest, 222.

16.ibid, 223.

17.ibid.

18.Shapoval Lecture.

19.ibid.

20.David Marples, Motherland: Russia in the Twentieth Century (Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited, 2002), 108.

21.Conquest, 223-224.

22.Mace, 45.

23.Hryshko, 83.

24.ibid.

25.ibid.

26.S.O. Pidhainy, et al., Black Deeds of the Kremlin A White Book, vol.2, The Great Famine in Ukraine in 1932- 1933 (Detroit: DOBRUS Democratic Organization of Ukrainians Formerly Persecuted by the Soviet Regime in U.S.A., 1955), 453.

27.ibid.

28.Conquest, 229.

29.ibid.

30.ibid.

31.ibid, 230.

32.ibid, 235.

33.Simon Hartfree, “The Tragedy of Collectivization: Was collectivization an economic necessity or an act of brutality designed to break the peasantry?”, Modern History Review 9, no.4 (April, 1998): 29.

34.Hryshko, 82.

35.S.O. Pidhainy, 460.

36.Marples, 108.

37.See J.V. Stalin, “Work in the Countryside: Speech Delivered on January 11, 1933,” in J. Stalin: Works, vol. 13, July 1930- January 1934, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1955.

38.Commission on the Ukrainain Famine, Report to Congress: Investigation of the Ukrainian Famine 1932-1933 (Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1988), ix.

39.ibid, x.

40.ibid.

41.Mace, 46.

42.Yar Slavutych, interview by Christina Maslo, tape recording, Edmonton, Alberta, 21 November 2003.

43.Conquest, 245.

44.Michael Mischenko, “Hunger as a Method of Terror and Rule in the Soviet Union,” Ukrainian Quarterly 5, no. 2 (Summer 1949): 225.

45.Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Relations (New York: Taylor and Francis, 1990), 328.

46.Commission on the Ukrainain Famine, x. Also see Miron Dolot, Who Killed Them and Why? In remembrance of those killed in the Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Ukrainian Studies Fund, 1984, and Anna Bolubash, “The Great Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933: An Instrument of Russian Nationalities Policy,” Ukrainian Review (London, England) 26, no. 4 (Winter 1982): 11-23, and continued in 27, no. 1 (Spring 1979): 31-59.

47.Stalin, 220.

48.From Valerii Vasyli’iev, and Iurii Shapoval, eds., Komandyry velykoho holodu: Poyizku V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrayinu ta na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz, 1932-1933 r [Commanders of the great famine: V. Molotov’s and L. Kaganovich’s Trips to Ukraine and the North Caucasus during the Years 1932-1933], Kyiv: Geneza, 2001, as cited by Mace, James E. “Is the Ukrainian Genocide a Myth?” In Canadian-American Slavic Studies: Special Issue: Holodomor-The Ukrainian Genocide 1932-1933 37, no. 3 (Fall 2003): 47-48.

49.Shapoval Lecture.

50.Anna Bolubash, “The Great Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933: An Instrument of Russian Nationalities Policy,” Ukrainian Review (London, England) 27, no. 1 (Spring 1979): 43.

51.ibid.

52.Hryhory Kostiuk, Stalinist Rule in the Ukraine: A Study of the Decade of Mass Terror (1929-1939) ( Munich, Germany: Institute for the Study of the USSR, 1960), 41.

53.ibid, 40.

54.Hryshko, 86.

55.K. Hohol, and B. Krawchenko, “Postyshev, Pavel,” Encyclopedia of Ukraine, 1984 ed., 167.

56.Markus, V., “Famine,” Encyclopedia of Ukraine, 1984 ed., 854.

57.Kostiuk, 59.

58.Mace, “Famine and Nationalism in Soviet Ukraine,” 48.

59.Kostiuk, 61.

60.ibid, 62.

61.ibid, 64.

62.Hryshko, 91.

63.Dzyuba, I., “Russification,” Encyclopedia of Ukraine, 1993 ed., 471.

64.Mace, “Famine and Nationalism in Soviet Ukraine,” 49.

65.Bolubash 27, no.1, 41.

66.Dolot, 5.

67.Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Relations, 328.

68.Mace, “Famine and Nationalism in Soviet Ukraine,” 40.

69.ibid.

70.Conquest, 327.

71.Bolubash 27, no.1, 49.

72.Conquest, 310-311.

73.James E. Mace, “The Man-Made Famine of 1933 in Soviet Ukraine,” in Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933, eds. Roman Serbyn, and Bohdan Krawchenko (Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, 1986): 10.

74.See Peter Borisow, “1933. Genocide. Ten Million. Holodomor,” (Foreword), Canadian-American Slavic Studies: Special Issue: Holodomor-The Ukrainian Genocide 1932-1933 37, no. 3 (Fall 2003): 1-6.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Works Consulted

1.Bolubash, Anna. “The Great Ukrainian Famine of 1932-1933: An Instrument of Russian Nationalities Policy.” Ukrainian Review (London, England) 26, no. 4 (Winter 1982): 11-23, and continued in 27, no. 1 (Spring 1979): 31-59.

2.Borisow, Peter. “1933. Genocide. Ten Million. Holodomor.” (Foreword). Canadian-American Slavic Studies: Special Issue: Holodomor-The Ukrainian Genocide 1932-1933 37, no. 3 (Fall 2003): 1-6.

3.Carynnyk, Marco, Lucuik, Lubomyr Y., and Kordan, Bohdan S., eds. The Foreign Office and the Famine: British Documents on Ukraine and the Great Famine of 1932-1933. Kingston, Ont.: Limestone Press, 1988.

4.Chalk, Frank and Jonassohn, Kurt. “Conceptualizations of Genocide and Ethnocide.” In Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933, eds. Serbyn, Roman and Krawchenko, Bohdan. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, 1986.

5.Commission on the Ukrainain Famine. Report to Congress: Investigation of the Ukrainian Famine 1932-1933. Washington D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1988.

6.Conquest, Robert. The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine. Edmonton: University of Alberta-Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 1987.

7.Davies, R. W., Tauger, M. B., and Wheatcroft, S.G. “Stalin, Grain Stocks and the Famine of 1932-1933.” Slavic Review 54, no. 3 (Fall 1995): 642-657.

8.Dmytryshyn, Basil. Moscow and the Ukraine. New York: Bookman Associates, 1956.

9.Dolot, Miron. Execution by Hunger: The Hidden Holocaust. Markham, Ont.: Penguin Books Canada, 1985.

10.Dolot, Miron. Who Killed Them and Why? In remembrance of those killed in the Famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Ukrainian Studies Fund, 1984.

11.Duranty, Walter. “Russians Hungry But Not Starving.” New York Times, 31 March 1933, 13.

12.Dzyuba, I. “Russification.” Encyclopedia of Ukraine. 1993 ed.

13.Encyclopedia of the United Nations and International Relations. New York: Taylor and Francis, 1990.

14.Hartfree, Simon, “The Tragedy of Collectivization: Was collectivization an economic necessity or an act of brutality designed to break the peasantry?” Modern History Review 9, no.4 (April 1998): 27-29.

15.Hohol, K., and Krawchenko, B. “Postyshev, Pavel.” Encyclopedia of Ukraine. 1984 ed.

16.Holubnychy, V. “Collectivization.” Encyclopedia of Ukraine. 1984 ed.

17.Hryshko, Wasyl. The Ukrainian Holocaust of 1933. Toronto: Bahriany Foundation; Suzhero; Dobrus, 1983.

18.Khrushchev, Nikita. Khrushchev Remembers. Boston-Toronto: Little, Brown and Company, 1970.

19.Kostiuk, Hryhory. Stalinist Rule in the Ukraine: A Study of the Decade of Mass Terror (1929-1939). Munich, Germany: Institute for the Study of the USSR, 1960.

20.Kravchenko, Victor. I Chose Freedom: The Personal and Political Life of a Soviet Official. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1946.

21.Kuz, Tony, ed. The Soviet Famine 1932-33: An Eyewitness Account of Conditions in the Spring and Summer of 1932 by Andrew Cairns. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, 1989.

22.Mace, James E. Communism and the Dilemmas of National Liberation: National Communism in Soviet Ukraine, 1918-1933. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1983.

23.Mace, James E. “Famine and Nationalism in Soviet Ukraine.” Problems of Communism 33, no. 3 (May-June 1984): 37-50.

24.Mace, James E. “Is the Ukrainian Genocide a Myth?” Canadian-American Slavic Studies: Special Issue: Holodomor-The Ukrainian Genocide 1932-1933 37, no. 3 (Fall 2003): 45-52.

25.Mace, James E. “The Man-Made Famine of 1933 in Soviet Ukraine.” In Famine in Ukraine 1932-1933, eds. Serbyn, Roman and Krawchenko, Bohdan. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, 1986.

26.Markus, V. “Famine.” Encyclopedia of Ukraine. 1984 ed.

27.Marples, David. Motherland: Russia in the Twentieth Century. Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited, 2002.

28.Mischenko, Michael. “Hunger as a Method of Terror and Rule in the Soviet Union.” Ukrainian Quarterly 5, no. 2 (Summer 1949): 219-225.

29.Muggeridge, Malcolm. “The Soviet War on the Peasants.” Fortnightly Review (London), 1 May 1933, 18-26.

30.Pidhainy, S.O., et al. Black Deeds of the Kremlin A White Book.Vol.1, Book of

31.Testimonies. Translated by Alexander Orelersky (Gregorovich) and Olga Prychodko. Toronto: Ukrainian Association of Victims of Russian Communist Terror, 1953.

32.Pidhainy, S.O., et al. Black Deeds of the Kremlin A White Book.Vol.2, The Great Famine in Ukraine in 1932- 1933. Detroit: DOBRUS Democratic Organization of Ukrainians Formerly Persecuted by the Soviet Regime in U.S.A., 1955.

33.Stalin, J.V. “Work in the Countryside: Speech Delivered on January 11, 1933.” In J. Stalin: Works. Vol. 13, July 1930- January 1934. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1955.

34.Subtelny, Orest. Ukraine: A History. Rev. ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press in association with the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 1994.

35.Tauger Mark B. “Natural Disaster and Human Actions in the Soviet Famine of 1931-1933.” The Carl Beck Papers in Russian and East European Studies, no. 1506, June 2001.

36.Tauger, Mark B. “The 1932 Harvest and the Famine of 1933.” Slavic Review 50 (Spring 1991):170-189.

37.Tottle, Douglas. Fraud, Famine and Fascism: The Ukrainian Genocide Myth from Hitler to Harvard. Toronto: Progress Books, 1987.

38.Vasyli’iev, Valerii and Shapoval, Iurii, eds. Komandyry velykoho holodu: Poyizku V. Molotova i L. Kahanovycha v Ukrayinu ta na Pivnichnyi Kavkaz, 1932-1933 r. [Commanders of the great famine: V. Molotov’s and L. Kaganovich’s Trips to Ukraine and the North Caucasus during the Years 1932-1933]. Kyiv: Geneza, 2001.


http://www.faminegenocide.com/print/2003-competition/01-maslo.html

No comments:

Post a Comment